Nearvo

The first year of living together

Updated September 6, 2026 · published by Baker Ventures LLC · sources cited inline

The first year rarely breaks on the things people worried about beforehand.

Nobody's relationship fails over whose name is on the lease. What actually causes trouble is smaller and duller: an uneven split of noticing, frictions that stayed unmentioned until they were large, and a money arrangement agreed once in month one and never revisited.

All three have the same shape. They are easy to fix early and hard to fix late, and the thing that decides which happens is whether there is a scheduled moment to raise them — because none of them is ever urgent enough to raise on its own.

Four groups. The last one is the most useful and the one people skip.

The labour, and who notices (1–7)

  1. Who currently notices when something needs doing? Not who does it. Who notices.
  2. What is on your mental list that I have never mentioned?
  3. What do you do that you think I have not registered?
  4. What do I do that you would rather I did differently, and have not said?
  5. Is our split actually even, or even-looking?
  6. What is the one task you would pay to never do again?
  7. What is a task you genuinely do not mind, that I have been avoiding?

Question 1 is the one that matters. Noticing is a job. It is usually distributed far more unevenly than doing, and it is invisible to whoever is not carrying it, which is exactly why it goes unaddressed for years.

Decide: the actual list, written down, including who notices what. Then a date to redo it.

The frictions nobody mentioned (8–14)

  1. What is a small thing I do that annoys you more than you have let on?
  2. What have you stopped mentioning because it felt too small to raise?
  3. Is there a room or a surface that is a running problem?
  4. What time do you actually want to go to bed, and does that work?
  5. How much noise, light and mess can you tolerate before it affects you?
  6. Is there something you have been quietly working around?
  7. What would you change about the space if money were not involved?

Question 9 is the whole point of this group. Small frictions do not stay small; they accumulate and then arrive all at once with a list attached. The cost of raising one early is an awkward minute. The cost of raising it in month eight is that it is no longer about the dishes.

Money, one year in (15–20)

  1. Is the split we agreed still fair, given what has changed?
  2. Has either of our incomes or costs shifted since we set it up?
  3. Is either of us quietly resentful about something financial?
  4. What are we saving for, if anything, and do we agree?
  5. What is the largest amount either of us has spent without mentioning it?
  6. Does the check-in threshold we set still make sense?

Arrangements decay. An income changes, a cost appears, and a split that was fair in month one is not in month twelve. Nobody raises it, because raising money is unpleasant and the arrangement was agreed. The full money question set.

The six-month review (21–26)

The group that makes the rest work, because it converts a vague sense that something is off into a scheduled conversation.

  1. What has been better than you expected about living together?
  2. What has been harder?
  3. What do you miss about how things were before?
  4. Is there anything you have not said because it felt disloyal to say?
  5. What is one thing each of us could change that would make the biggest difference?
  6. When are we doing this again?

Question 23 is the one people flinch at and the one worth asking. Missing something about how life was before is not a verdict on the relationship. It is ordinary, and pretending otherwise is how it turns into something unspoken.

Question 26 is the mechanism. A review that is not scheduled does not happen, and the reason to schedule it is that none of the problems above will ever feel urgent enough to raise on their own.

How to actually do these

One group per sitting. Twenty-six in one evening is an interrogation, and the answers you get at question 22 belong to someone who wants it to stop.

Answer separately, then compare. Without that, the second person anchors on the first and you get agreement instead of two answers. On the labour group especially, this is the difference between finding out what your partner thinks and finding out that your partner agrees with you.

Put the review in a calendar. Both calendars.

That separate-then-reveal mechanic is what Nearvo is built on: one question a day, answered separately, revealed to each other, with shared streaks that only advance when both of you show up. Planned at $49.99/year, $9.99/month or $129.99 once, one partner subscribing and both unlocking. In development, not released.

Questions before moving in together · More question sets · Why couples drift apart

Nearvo is not therapy. These are conversation prompts, not a treatment for a relationship in crisis, and not a substitute for working with a licensed couples therapist.

About Nearvo

Nearvo is an iOS app from Baker Ventures LLC built around a daily question for couples: one prompt, both partners answer, and you see each other's answer only after you have both replied. One partner subscribes and both unlock, because a paywall that asks two people to buy separately is how most couples apps quietly fail. The app is in development.

It is designed for the ordinary version of the problem, which is not a crisis: two people who live together, like each other, and have stopped asking anything that is not logistics. Nearvo is not therapy and does not diagnose a relationship. The question sets on this site are free, need no account, and the research pages cite the studies directly, including where the evidence is weaker than the popular version of it suggests.

Questions and answers

What usually goes wrong in the first year of living together?

Rarely the things people planned for. The recurring problems are an uneven division of noticing rather than doing, small frictions nobody mentions until they are large, and a money arrangement that was agreed once and never revisited as circumstances changed.

How often should you revisit how you split chores?

The first version is always wrong, so the useful move is to agree a date to redo it. A month in, then six months in. Without a scheduled review the split calcifies and whoever is unhappy either raises it as a complaint or does not raise it at all.

What is the invisible work in a household?

Noticing. Remembering that something needs doing, keeping track of when it was last done, and holding the mental list. It is usually distributed far more unevenly than the doing, and it is invisible to whoever is not carrying it.

How do you bring up something small that is annoying you?

Early, once, and as a request rather than a complaint. The cost of raising a small friction early is a slightly awkward minute. The cost of raising it after six months is that it is no longer small, and it arrives with evidence attached.

Is it normal to argue more after moving in together?

Common, and it is usually about the sheer increase in decisions rather than about the relationship. Two people who saw each other three evenings a week now negotiate everything, and most of it is new.

Cite this pageNearvo. “The first year of living together.” Baker Ventures LLC, September 6, 2026. https://nearvo.bakerventuresstudio.com/questions/the-first-year-living-together/